PALAEOLITHIC ARTIFACT TAPHONOMY IN TERRA ROSSA SITES AT NORTHWESTERN GREECE REVISITED: TWO NEW CASE STUDIES

Authors

  • Stefanos Ligkovanlis Department of History and Archaeology, University of Crete, University Campus Gallos, Rethymnon GR-74100, Crete, Greece
  • George Iliopoulos Department of Geology, University of Patras, GR-26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
  • Ourania Palli Department of History and Archaeology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Campus Zografou GR -15784 Athens, Greece
  • Antonia Tzortzatou Ephorate of Antiquities of Thesprotia, Greek Ministry of Culture and Sports, 68 Kyprou St– Igoumenitsa, Greece
  • Peny Tsakanikou Department of History and Archaeology, University of Crete, University Campus Gallos, Rethymnon GR-74100, Crete, Greece

Keywords:

Taphonomy, terra rossa, lithic artifacts, archaeological context, Palaeolithic open-air sites, Northwestern Greece, Upper Palaeolithic, Middle Palaeolithic

Abstract

One of the great debates in the Palaeolithic research of SE Europe is the taphonomy of stone tools recovered from open-air sites associated with terra rossa deposits. Some researchers have claimed that Palaeolithic material can be found in situ in these formations, whereas others have excluded any such possibility. During the last fifteen years, excavations have brought to light a large number of lithic artifacts of Middle and Upper Palaeolithic age from the open-air sites of Eleftherochori 7 and Molondra, both located in terra rossa deposits in Thesprotia, NW Greece. The study of stratigraphic/spatial context along with the technology, typology, refitting potential, preservation, and surface alteration of these findings leads to clear conclusions about the taphonomy of the artifacts, indicating that at the case of Eleftherochori 7 and Molondra there is no evidence for any in situ recovery of stone tools. Despite this conclusion, we argue that each Palaeolithic open-air site located in terra rossa deposits should be considered as a unique case and conclusions drawn about the taphonomy of its findings should be based on the evaluation not only of geological but also of archaeological data.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-28

Issue

Section

Articles